If you put it that way, then it becomes a matter of opinion what 'design flaw' means. But I think we are way past the point were you can state that someone or a few people just doesn't like how something works. I think more than a few people are well aware that vb4 has highly problematic design flaws. CMS software design, CMS SEO, Search, Asset manager, to name a few major parts have all been named time and time again by members here who know what they are talking about, that it would be better to toss and rewrite or at the very least overhaul.
No, I am specifically relating to functions that were introduced or changed in vb4, like mentioned above.
14 out of 100 bugs are not confirmed yet. 3 are awaiting feedback. I think you may have misread. Or you can see bugs that I cant see.
Well let me put it this way: In my opinion you and a few others are fixing a massive number of bugs already. But if in your opinion there are no massive numbers, then surely it should be possible to fix it all within a month or two. I would be much surprised if you can do that, because I do think its a massive number. And much more important: I think the quality of the product is heavily influenced by the design flaws and the bugs present. Especially when taking into account which features were announced to us, and which features are still listed on the feature list, but can only be attributed to a very rich imagination and not to what the product really does. There is a gross discrepancy between that.
Anyway, its getting way off topic. The question asked was if vb4 was better in terms of security. The answer is that neither vb3 nor vb4 have known security issues. vbs responds relatively quickly if any issues arise.
vb4 is usable for many. Its not all doom and gloom. But IMHO it doesn't really improve on vb3 either.
No, I am specifically relating to functions that were introduced or changed in vb4, like mentioned above.
14 out of 100 bugs are not confirmed yet. 3 are awaiting feedback. I think you may have misread. Or you can see bugs that I cant see.
Well let me put it this way: In my opinion you and a few others are fixing a massive number of bugs already. But if in your opinion there are no massive numbers, then surely it should be possible to fix it all within a month or two. I would be much surprised if you can do that, because I do think its a massive number. And much more important: I think the quality of the product is heavily influenced by the design flaws and the bugs present. Especially when taking into account which features were announced to us, and which features are still listed on the feature list, but can only be attributed to a very rich imagination and not to what the product really does. There is a gross discrepancy between that.
Anyway, its getting way off topic. The question asked was if vb4 was better in terms of security. The answer is that neither vb3 nor vb4 have known security issues. vbs responds relatively quickly if any issues arise.
vb4 is usable for many. Its not all doom and gloom. But IMHO it doesn't really improve on vb3 either.
Comment