I suspect that I am all set with the server. I've had the server support team go all through those and they have washed their hands of this issue.
One thing that really confirms this is, that in > admin > attachments > attachment manager, if I set the jpg extension to 8000 X 8000, everything works perfectly.
It is when I set jpg to 800 X 800 forcing the 3.6.1 to downsize the photo that my page not found issue takes place. In fact, the photo does upload and get resized and stored! That works perfectly!
The issue is that the inexperienced operator has no idea what happened. One has to simply close the attachment window error and reopen it by clicking Manage Attachments. The image then shows in the attachment window. My users can't cope with this type of workaround.
Would it be possible to flag Freddie Bingham to take a look at this thread and my ticket? He has many other posts on here, dealing with 3.6.1 image resizing at vBulletin. My ticket ended up by sending me to the server optimization thread. I don't hold much hope with that. http://www.vbulletin.com/forum/showt...39#post1222539
One thing that really confirms this is, that in > admin > attachments > attachment manager, if I set the jpg extension to 8000 X 8000, everything works perfectly.
It is when I set jpg to 800 X 800 forcing the 3.6.1 to downsize the photo that my page not found issue takes place. In fact, the photo does upload and get resized and stored! That works perfectly!
The issue is that the inexperienced operator has no idea what happened. One has to simply close the attachment window error and reopen it by clicking Manage Attachments. The image then shows in the attachment window. My users can't cope with this type of workaround.
Would it be possible to flag Freddie Bingham to take a look at this thread and my ticket? He has many other posts on here, dealing with 3.6.1 image resizing at vBulletin. My ticket ended up by sending me to the server optimization thread. I don't hold much hope with that. http://www.vbulletin.com/forum/showt...39#post1222539
Comment