Have you ever heard of this "planet" before?
Nibiru
Collapse
X
-
I've heard of the theory before and there's decent evidence worthing more study.
(side note: Pluto isn't really considered a planet )--filburt1, vBulletin.org/vBulletinTemplates.com moderator
Web Design Forums.net: vB Board of the Month
vBulletin Mail System (vBMS): webmail for your forum users -
Originally posted by filburt1I've heard of the theory before and there's decent evidence worthing more study.
(side note: Pluto isn't really considered a planet )Running vB since 4-14-2002Comment
-
The call the Sun a planet. They call the moon a planet. There's enough scientific ignorance right there to disqualify anything they claim.:)Comment
-
Originally posted by DirectPixel
The call the Sun a planet. They call the moon a planet. There's enough scientific ignorance right there to disqualify anything they claim.You're my Prince of Peace
And I will live my life for YouComment
-
They're basing their "scientific discoveries" not on facts, but on religion.
There's not a single mention of any type of scientific method -- all they have are biblical quotes and allusions.:)Comment
-
Yep. I heard about this way back in high school on a rerun of In Search Of (with Leonard Nimoy... kickin' out the jams).
I always thought it was pretty interesting. One of the more intriguing bits of "evidence" supporting the claim was that the planet returns every 3600 years or so -- and coincidentally, every 3600 years on earth, there's a major advancement in technology. The last one was supposedly in 200 BC.
The rest of the evidence is Sumerian wall drawings that show -- whoa -- twelve planets, and Biblical references to the Nefilim.
Now call me crazy, but it's generally scientists who discover planets, and when they do, they can show the evidence through, say, a telescope. If the so-called "twelfth" planet is out there, why has not one astronomer found it? At some point, of course, if you're one of these guys who believes in this mystical heavenly body, you'll have to believe that there's a government conspiracy to cover it up, because that's the only way to explain the lack of hard evidence.
It's a modern form of religion. It makes for a fun story, but don't get too invested in the concept if they can't back it up.Comment
-
Originally posted by DirectPixelThey're basing their "scientific discoveries" not on facts, but on religion.
There's not a single mention of any type of scientific method -- all they have are biblical quotes and allusions.
That's scientifically speaking of course.You're my Prince of Peace
And I will live my life for YouComment
-
Originally posted by DirectPixel
The call the Sun a planet. They call the moon a planet. There's enough scientific ignorance right there to disqualify anything they claim.
Ignorance is not looking at the whole article and reading context into it that doesn't exist.Translations provided by Google.
Wayne Luke
The Rabid Badger - a vBulletin Cloud demonstration site.
vBulletin 5 APIComment
-
-
Originally posted by Wayne LukeThe ignorant science you are talking about is from 6,000 years ago. Not very ignorant when you realize they knew about Neptune, Uranus and Pluto which were discovered in the last 200 years by modern science.
Ignorance is not looking at the whole article and reading context into it that doesn't exist.:)Comment
-
Originally posted by bigmattyhYep. I heard about this way back in high school on a rerun of In Search Of (with Leonard Nimoy... kickin' out the jams).
I always thought it was pretty interesting. One of the more intriguing bits of "evidence" supporting the claim was that the planet returns every 3600 years or so -- and coincidentally, every 3600 years on earth, there's a major advancement in technology. The last one was supposedly in 200 BC.
The rest of the evidence is Sumerian wall drawings that show -- whoa -- twelve planets, and Biblical references to the Nefilim.
Now call me crazy, but it's generally scientists who discover planets, and when they do, they can show the evidence through, say, a telescope. If the so-called "twelfth" planet is out there, why has not one astronomer found it? At some point, of course, if you're one of these guys who believes in this mystical heavenly body, you'll have to believe that there's a government conspiracy to cover it up, because that's the only way to explain the lack of hard evidence.
It's a modern form of religion. It makes for a fun story, but don't get too invested in the concept if they can't back it up.
Just like Pluto, it was found in 1930, but it had long been rumored to exist because of its effect on the orbits of other planets.You're my Prince of Peace
And I will live my life for YouComment
-
Originally posted by nunoChrist, that was 3500 BC, I find remarkable that Sumerians knew about 10 or 12 planets, Pluto was only discovered in 1930, and it's satellite, Charon, in 1978, they already knew about that 5000 years ago, and you call'em ignorant?
Show me that they knew that Uranus is tilted on its axis. Show me that they knew that Pluto was a ball of ice barely the size of the moon. If they were so advanced and had all this ancient knowledge, they ought to have known at least that much.Comment
-
Originally posted by Wayne LukeThe ignorant science you are talking about is from 6,000 years ago. Not very ignorant when you realize they knew about Neptune, Uranus and Pluto which were discovered in the last 200 years by modern science.
Ignorance is not looking at the whole article and reading context into it that doesn't exist.Originally posted by DirectPixelSo you believe I am ignorant? Of course I am. I do not study astronomy, and my life does not depend on me studying the stars every night. So yes, I am ignorant in that field.You're my Prince of Peace
And I will live my life for YouComment
-
Here's another way of putting my skepticism: HOW? How did they know about these things? You can't just point to wall carvings and say, "Well, they knew it, it doesn't matter how." It really does. You can't claim understanding of a thing unless you know how you know about it.
Look. If I say, nuno, you're a male. And you say: You're right! How did you know that? And I say, "I have ancient wisdom that tells me these things," you're going to believe me, right? I don't know that you're a male. I've never met you. I'm taking an educated guess. And you know that because you know I don't know you, and you also know that we've never had a discussion of your sex before. So you know, by induction, that I must have guessed that you were a male. Educated guess, sure. But you know that I don't know that for a fact.
It's the same thing with this situation. If you can't show me how the ancient Sumerians knew about the 12 planets -- if you can't show me the mechanism by which they came to that knowledge -- it's all speculation on what their mythology meant. Not proof of anything. Which is more plausible? That the ancient Sumerians were contacted by aliens from our own solar system, who left no subtantial proof of their existence, and were given knowledge by this all-wise master race which left its DNA and technology behind (but again, no proof of its own existence), who live on a mystical "12th" planet (depending on how you define "planet" ) which has still yet to be discovered, despite the fact that we can find planets outside our own solar system? Or is it more likely that the Sumerians told stories, like all cultures have, that were the products of imagination?
It's time to whip out the BS detector. This one doesn't pass.
Guys. You're gullible if you believe this stuff. I mean, it's fun to think about, but don't take it seriously. It can be really harmful if you entertain this kind of thing as reality. It's just as harmful if you think that anything is possible. There's a point where you have to draw a line and say "No, that doesn't fly." As my homies would say, keep it real.Comment
widgetinstance 262 (Related Topics) skipped due to lack of content & hide_module_if_empty option.
Comment