Sweet, sweet irony

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Chen
    replied
    You have the most boring job ever, don't you fliburt...

    Leave a comment:


  • Tolitz
    replied
    so you're saying arrogant = malicious?

    A site has to make money, one way or the other ... if you don't like that particular business practice, you can always refrain from visiting them

    Leave a comment:


  • filburt1
    replied
    Originally posted by Paul J
    No, your settings in IE say to block all cookies and to notify you when a cookie is tryring to be set.

    There is no setting in IE's cookie handling procedures to block "malicious" cookies.
    Here's what it thinks is malicious.

    I think it's arrogant of CNet simply because they already have so much advertising and "sponsored" downloads on their site. People know that download.com is the most popular shareware/freeware/demo download site and people who make a small but useful piece of shareware will now have to pay to list it.

    Leave a comment:


  • Paul J
    replied
    Maybe we'll start to get some decent software on there as opposed to the blatant spam that people put up there now.

    Why do people want their cake and eat it to? What's wrong with a company trying to make money? How dare they charge to use their service.

    Leave a comment:


  • Mutant Lobster
    replied
    What does a mutant cookie look like?

    Leave a comment:


  • Freddie Bingham
    replied
    Originally posted by orca
    Well, heard about download.com now charging for authors wanting to add software?
    Please tell me if you find something offensive about that. Can you imagine the amount of bandwidth they must use every month?
    Last edited by Freddie Bingham; Mon 30 Sep '02, 8:21am.

    Leave a comment:


  • George L
    replied
    Originally posted by orca
    Well, heard about download.com now charging for authors wanting to add software?
    really ?

    Leave a comment:


  • Menno
    replied
    Originally posted by Paul J
    No, your settings in IE say to block all cookies and to notify you when a cookie is tryring to be set.

    There is no setting in IE's cookie handling procedures to block "malicious" cookies.
    exactly. IE can't tell the difference between cookies.

    Leave a comment:


  • Paul J
    replied
    No, your settings in IE say to block all cookies and to notify you when a cookie is tryring to be set.

    There is no setting in IE's cookie handling procedures to block "malicious" cookies.

    Leave a comment:


  • filburt1
    replied
    Originally posted by Paul J
    Dude, websites use cookies.

    Welcome to Earth.
    IE blocked them because it thought they were malicious.

    Leave a comment:


  • orca
    replied
    Well, heard about download.com now charging for authors wanting to add software?

    Leave a comment:


  • ccd1
    replied
    Originally posted by Paul J
    Dude, websites use cookies.

    Welcome to Earth.
    Take me to your leader.

    Leave a comment:


  • Paul J
    replied
    Dude, websites use cookies.

    Welcome to Earth.

    Leave a comment:


  • SkuZZy
    replied
    Mind explaining what i'm looking at? It looks like it's just trying to add cookies?
    Last edited by SkuZZy; Sun 29 Sep '02, 9:44pm.

    Leave a comment:


  • filburt1
    started a topic Sweet, sweet irony

    Sweet, sweet irony

    CNet is so lame now, check it out. Good ol' IE6:
widgetinstance 262 (Related Topics) skipped due to lack of content & hide_module_if_empty option.
Working...