Safari on the iPhone shouldn't have to worry about screen resolution, especially with 10.6 ahead.
Screen Resolution
Collapse
X
-
Most users probably don't browse the web in a traditional fashion with their mobile device. However they probably have applications that allow them to get the information they need while mobile easily. I have maps, weather alerts, traffic information, movie lookups and bank alerts on my mobile phone for easy tracking. Heck, my mobile phone doubles as an RSA token device so that I can log into my online banking when I want.Translations provided by Google.
Wayne Luke
The Rabid Badger - a vBulletin Cloud demonstration site.
vBulletin 5 APIComment
-
Cell phones can be tricky when planning out Web sites. Images are scaled and pages are fit to the phone, however the CSS is sometimes funky and Javascript doesn't always work as it should (if at all).
Maybe this is different on non-Verizon phones, but it seems better to just serve raw data as an XML file to cell phones.Comment
-
Desktop: 1680x1050 (2x)
Laptop: 1280x800
Server: 1024x768
Daddy: 1152x864
I guess at least offering a 800x600-compatble style is a nice gesture as many people want to surf the internet with their cellphone these days...
Well, I'll most likely never understand why they need such a "handheld"-web, but users are the majority compared to admins :-)
I'm thinking this is a hits from cell phones?Last edited by MRGTB; Fri 15 Aug '08, 6:03am.Comment
-
Cell phones can be tricky when planning out Web sites. Images are scaled and pages are fit to the phone, however the CSS is sometimes funky and Javascript doesn't always work as it should (if at all).
Maybe this is different on non-Verizon phones, but it seems better to just serve raw data as an XML file to cell phones.Translations provided by Google.
Wayne Luke
The Rabid Badger - a vBulletin Cloud demonstration site.
vBulletin 5 APIComment
-
Check Your Google Analytics
Google Analytics for our site indicates only 6.95% of visitors are using 800x600 resolution. Everyone else is using a higher resolution with 1024x768 leading the pack at 40.98%. In total, 93.05% of our users are using 1024px screen width OR wider. So we really aren't going to gear our site to the 6.95% (old technology) over the 93.05% (current technology). All our pages are 1000px in width.
All the same, we do hope to have a .mobi format site in the future.
-- Rik
ps: We went to 1000px width about 1.5 years ago after studying the Google Analytics data (in case you are wondering which came first: the chicken or the egg). All the same, we trying to edge up to larger font sizes.Comment
-
-
I actually just bought a 19'' widescreen flat panel LCD a couple of days ago to replace an old Dell 17'' CRT monitor I got back in 1998 or something like that. I made the jump from 1024·768 to 1680·1050. Wow, what a difference it makes!
I still have two CRTs left running a minimum of 10:7, but I plan on getting two new systems very soon, both of which come with free 20'' flat panels.Comment
-
iMac: 1920 x 1200
Macbook: 1280 x 800
Win PC: no idea - but it's probably pretty high (not booting it up just to check the res though!)
Win Laptop: 800 x 600 (it's really old - probably 6 or 7 years old - and very knackered. It doesn't come out very often but useful for still having IE6 and FF 1.5 on it)
[edit] and don't forget the iPhone on whatever the standard res for it is.
I used to use a 240 x 160 res a lot too. Yes, that is 240 and 160. I'm not missing any numbers! Now that was fun to useComment
-
Comment
widgetinstance 262 (Related Topics) skipped due to lack of content & hide_module_if_empty option.
Comment