what's your rank as a poster?

[Mazinger]

I'm #1151 *

*How to get: Open Memberlist, arrange it by posts, locate your username in which page, multiply tha page number * 30, the add your rank in the page (your row number)

[RagnarokDensetsu]

Excluding "hst" who has a ridiculously high postcount and only 3 posts, I'm #467.

[MrNase]

#38

but... who cares? Not the quantity counts...

[Mazinger]

Excluding "hst" who has a ridiculously high postcount and only 3 posts, I'm #467.

I incloded him anyway

[Lurk]

My rank is 278

[Lenni]

260

[Freddie Bingham]

# 9

[ManagerJosh]

I'm #1151 *

*How to get: Open Memberlist, arrange it by posts, locate your username in which page, multiply tha page number * 30, the add your rank in the page (your row number)

I believe your ranking equation is flawed. No one would ever get #1. The highest someone would get is #31

[Freddie Bingham]

(Page number - 1) * 30 + Row number

[ManagerJosh]

(Page number - 1) * 30 + Row number

That looks right

[Mazinger]

I believe your ranking equation is flawed. No one would ever get #1. The highest someone would get is #31

I'm #1151 not #1.

[Mazinger]

Lol, hst is not #1 anymore, so I think everybody has made a one rank progess.

[ManagerJosh]

I'm #1151 not #1.

No, I'm saying your equation is all off. IF we used your mathematical equation, the highest rank any member here can get would be #31.

Take Steve Machol for an example. We know he's number 1.

Using your equation:

He's on page 1, row 1.

(pg 1 x 30) = 30
30+ (row 1) = 31.

It doesn't work.

[Mazinger]

Yup, Freddie corrected it.

(Page number - 1) * 30 + Row number

[JakeS]

#65543454234523