PDA

View Full Version : Hosting VB on Multiple Servers, are these servers suitable?


donnacha
Thu 11th Mar '04, 8:03pm
Hi,

I'd be very interested in hearing opinions on the 2 dedicated servers I'm planning to buy from ServerMatrix, to host what I expect to become a fairly heavily-used VB site. In particular, I'd like to hear if you think I could spend the same money more effectively in a different way. For instance, should I be thinking about Xeons rather than P4s?

I'll be spreading the site over 2 servers, connected to eachother via a crossover cable, synchronized via Mysql replication.

2.8 Ghz Intel Pentium 4 800FSB, with HT
2 x 80GB Hard Drive
1024MB RAM
1000GB Bandwidth
5 Usable IP's
FreeBSD
Floodguard Protection ($10 per month, worth it?)

NO Cpanel/WHM

Per server $99/setup, $139/mth
Total for both $198/setup, $178/mth

I'm going for FreeBSD because these servers will be hosting ONLY VB and FreeBSD seems to offer better integration of the core services that VB needs. In that very lean configuration, I gather that it tends to be somewhat more efficient that Linux. FreeBSD's CVSup system also seems to offer a less time-consuming way to upgrade and keep my servers synchronized. RHE would cost exactly the same.

I have decided to avoid CPanel/WHT because, going on past experience, while it makes account and name-server creation easier, it seems to mess up quite a bit and I feel that editing the relevant configuration files by hand will give me a better grip on things.

I'd love to hear what you all think, Thanks.

okrogius
Thu 11th Mar '04, 11:02pm
I agree wholeheartedly on your cpanel/whm commentary. The only cp you may want to look at is plesk 7 - no experience with it's internal workings, but it's quite nice from the outside (of course not as nice as by hand, but it may be at a level "good enough").

Out of curiosity - why mysql replication rather then one webserver and one database server?

Shining Arcanine
Fri 12th Mar '04, 6:57am
Drop the replication and simply use the 2nd server for MySQL. Dual servers are meant to decrease load, not increase it.