Revert to old sig rules please

[Razasharp]

I knew it would happen - sigs are getting bigger and bigger now, and it's making the pages look a little cluttered, will only be a matter of time before people compete to have the sig that stands out the most :eek: I don't want to turn off sigs completely as it's interesting to see what people put in them sometimes.

Can we revert to the rule where you can have 4 lines of standard text OR an image? That worked fine for years. Also apologies to all using text and images, and non standard fonts/sizes in sigs - don't mean to be a killjoy, just prefer a nice clean page to read :o.

[Steve Machol]

The rules haven't changed:

http://www.vbulletin.com/forum/misc.php?do=showrules

[Shelby]

Why are signature images limited to 300 width, when text can be obviously larger?

[Steve Machol]

That is the decision we made many years ago. It's rather odd to question it now but we feel that an image is not equivalent to text.

[nexialys]

having it 300x100 is not a good proportion, graphically and artistically talking... 234x60 pixels is perfect... 120x90 is good also... ;)

read this: http://www.iab.net/about_the_iab/recent_press_releases/press_release_archive/press_release/4219

[Paul M]

Im just curious why you cant have text and an image ?

[Wayne Luke]

Im just curious why you cant have text and an image ?
Because we decided that it made signatures too cluttered when we made the rules for this site.