PDA

View Full Version : If I go with VPS would performance vB suffer greatly if I ad multiple sites to VPS?



tnedator
Sun 14th Oct '07, 3:00pm
I am leaning towards one of these three VPS accounts that all cost roughly the same:

ServINT 512MB
PowerVPS 640MB
JaguarPC 768MB

I can greatly offset the cost of the VPS if I eliminate all my shared hosting accounts. Currently I have 6 cheap shared hosting accounts ranging from $6 to $12 a piece.

One of those shared hosting accounts has 8 add on domains, but all but one is used mostly just for email accounts. There are some files uploaded, such as images for forum signatures and stuff like that, but primarily they are just email domains.

One of the domains runs a Mambo site, that gets only 50-100 visits a day, which I use simply as a news agragating site (Broncos07.com). Also, that same site has a PHP script that creates a sig image on the fly, that grabs the latest five news headlines and builds a sig on the fly. As this is a forum sig image, the PHP script that builds it is called 1,000 or so times a day (last month, the script was hit 27,000 times). The script has a .png file extension, but that is only so it will work with forums IMG tags, it is actually a PHP script: http://www.cherokeeflyer.com/sig/sig.png



I also have a script that runs every 10 minutes that grabs news headlines from a newsgator (RSS agragator site) account and then parses it and inserts the new RSS headlines into the Mambo DB.

Beyond that, I have some other static images (again, primarily smaller images for sigs) that might get 500-1000 hits a day.

My vBulletin site has:
Threads: 3,224, Posts: 31,846, Members: 208, Active Members: 171
400-800 new posts a day
15-35 logged in members at a time (58 most ever)

While I expect some member growth, I don't see any dramatic changes in the new post numbers or online members in the short term. It is possible we will have a user spike and get 60 or 70 members on at one time, but the above numbers are likely to remain pretty steady.

So, if I co-locate those sites I described above (20+ email accounts, a Mambo news site, some image hosting -static and dynamic- for forum signatures), is my vBulletin performance likely to suffer, or will the VPS likely handle all the sites with no problems?

Thanks for the advice.

StrongMotive
Sun 14th Oct '07, 4:39pm
The VPS should be able to handle it - make sure you optimize your apache and mysql aswell

tnedator
Sun 14th Oct '07, 4:51pm
The VPS should be able to handle it - make sure you optimize your apache and mysql aswell

Should any of those RAM options cut it, or would I need the highest (768MB) option to support all the sites?

StrongMotive
Sun 14th Oct '07, 4:53pm
Should any of those RAM options cut it, or would I need the highest (768MB) option to support all the sites?

Well the best RAM would be good, the best way to find out about each VPS provider is visit webhostingtalk.com and search their forums, they have great reviews.

tnedator
Sun 14th Oct '07, 5:17pm
Well the best RAM would be good, the best way to find out about each VPS provider is visit webhostingtalk.com and search their forums, they have great reviews.

I have all. All three seemed to come highly recommended, each of them seem to have had their rough times, but they seem to be the highest rated VPS when combining quality of support, semi/full management and performance/reliability. So, based on that, I am willing to give any of them a shot.

One of the reasons for asking about the RAM, which I didn't make clear, is while those three different RAM points cost roughly the same depending on the VPS provider, if 512mb is enough, then I can go with a lower plan from JaguarPC to start out, with the ability to upgrade if needed. However, if 512mb is likely borderline at best, then I would go with one of the higher RAM options.

StrongMotive
Sun 14th Oct '07, 5:29pm
The best option is to try the 512MB RAM, and looking at your sites, I believe it will be borderline, so maybe 768MB would be best. As I said earlier, make sure you optimize your VPS apache and mysql and install a PHP cache like xcache. (You can get all this help in the server configuration forum: http://www.vbulletin.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?f=14). Make sure you read this before you post in there:

http://www.vbulletin.com/forum/showthread.php?t=70117

0ptima
Sun 14th Oct '07, 8:07pm
I have a VPS with Servint and im on the 256mb plan and my forum is busier than yours. I also host some other low traffic sites, including one that uses Mambo and the vps is doing fine. I highly recommend Servint, as they have great tech support and quick (usually within minutes) response times. Their forums also have a lot of useful threads on how to optimize your VPS.

If the 256mb plan is not enough for you, you can easily upgrade with no down time or have to move to another sever.

tnedator
Sun 14th Oct '07, 8:11pm
I have a VPS with Servint and im on the 256mb plan and my forum is busier than yours. I also host some other low traffic sites, including one that uses Mambo and the vps is doing fine. I highly recommend Servint, as they have great tech support and quick (usually within minutes) response times. Their forums also have a lot of useful threads on how to optimize your VPS.

If the 256mb plan is not enough for you, you can easily upgrade with no down time or have to move to another sever.

Are you using a control panel?

tnedator
Sun 14th Oct '07, 9:46pm
I guess I missed zone.net, which is among the most highly rated on webhostingtalk.

They have a 15% off coupone that gives you a 1152 MB of guaranteed (SLM) RAM, but I can't tell if they have any burst RAM. With the coupon this winds up being $80 a month, which is basically the same as the other options I listed. On the plus side, it has the most guaranteed RAM by a pretty good bit, and the servers are the beefiest (although probably means more VPS's per box) with dual quad core CPU's, but there is no burst RAM to help out in an overload situation.

As I am less than a novice when it comes to VPS, I don't know if 768mb guaranteed that is burstable to 2gb is better or worse than 1152mb guaranteed.

What do you think? More guaranteed RAM or less guaranteed but the possibility of burst RAM?

express
Sun 14th Oct '07, 9:58pm
If you are going to run cpanel get no less than 384 megs. 512 would be better.
If you have usage go with 768 or 1000 megs.
You could always start lower then go to more ram once you see what the vps is doing.

Ask what size cpu's the vps's have and how many vps's are on the same server..


Joey

0ptima
Sun 14th Oct '07, 10:24pm
Are you using a control panel?

Yes, Cpanel.

0ptima
Sun 14th Oct '07, 10:26pm
I guess I missed zone.net, which is among the most highly rated on webhostingtalk.


What kind of ratings is servint getting on wht?




What do you think? More guaranteed RAM or less guaranteed but the possibility of burst RAM?

More guaranteed ram is better, as everyone fights for the burstable ram

tnedator
Sun 14th Oct '07, 10:47pm
What kind of ratings is servint getting on wht?



More guaranteed ram is better, as everyone fights for the burstable ram

They list ServINTs support as among the best. Most seem to list the performance as good, but not the best. There is rarely anything but positive reviews for ServINT.

alemcherry
Sun 21st Oct '07, 12:59pm
VPS should be perfectly fine. Just look for assured RAM of 512 or more. You are probably not going to get the burstanble ram when you need it the most - during peak time :)