David Copeland
Sat 12th Aug '00, 9:26pm
[b]I think it's time to discuss the most
important issue and strategies to keep
bandwidth and hit costs DOWN
to $15/mo instead of paying $250/mo.
In another topic I read how the number
of pictures placed on one page can cause
that hit to be multiplies by 10!
I also read that by pulling images and
pictures from another free server, such
as hotmail, yahoo, geocities, etc, that
the bandwidth and hits would not be as
severe as having those pictures parked
on the same host you have your forum parked.
As a novice in all this, I thought the only
cost issue was bandwidth. But there has
also been the cost of the number of hits
a server can get . . . such as 1000 to 80,000 a
day or more!
Questions for all:
---------------
If I list our forum in all the search engines,
I've been told that we stand the chance of
spam being sent to a default email address
such as "webmaster@myforum.com" Some web
sites start at one free page which requires
a manual click on the user to access the
home host page server (thereby eliminating
the spam email coming to webmaster).
Question: What success (or complaints) have
you had regarding listing your site on the
search engines . . . and whether or not you
received spam or a lot of unnecessary hits?
---------------
Have you measured the difference with parking
your pictures on the home server versus having
them parked on a free server elsewhere, and
tagging the picture off-line? Or is the bandwidth
cost the same?
---------------
If you list your forum on the search engines,
and have the domain terminate on an html page,
whereby the member has to manually click to
access your pearl forum . . . would that save
hits and bandwidth . . . versus having all of
your domains hit on your pearl forum?
---------------
I have used jpg pictures over bmp pictures
thinking that the size of the jpg file comes
out smaller than a bmp file, and therefore
should save me bandwidth when the picture loads
up. Is that true?
---------------
Is there another picture format that I can use
besides jpg and bmp files that will produce a
high quality large image, but will use less
bandwidth?
---------------
There's been a lot of talk about the size
of a forum that grows, and what to do with
archiving the old topics. Has anyone tried
parking an Archive Site elsewhere for free,
which would have less traffic?
---------------
Is it possible to save on hits by combining
ALL of the (6-10) separate pictures on one
page into ONE image file, so as to eliminate
having the page load 6 to 10 times for each picture?
Any other ideas for saving on hit and bandwidth
costs?
Thanks,
David
important issue and strategies to keep
bandwidth and hit costs DOWN
to $15/mo instead of paying $250/mo.
In another topic I read how the number
of pictures placed on one page can cause
that hit to be multiplies by 10!
I also read that by pulling images and
pictures from another free server, such
as hotmail, yahoo, geocities, etc, that
the bandwidth and hits would not be as
severe as having those pictures parked
on the same host you have your forum parked.
As a novice in all this, I thought the only
cost issue was bandwidth. But there has
also been the cost of the number of hits
a server can get . . . such as 1000 to 80,000 a
day or more!
Questions for all:
---------------
If I list our forum in all the search engines,
I've been told that we stand the chance of
spam being sent to a default email address
such as "webmaster@myforum.com" Some web
sites start at one free page which requires
a manual click on the user to access the
home host page server (thereby eliminating
the spam email coming to webmaster).
Question: What success (or complaints) have
you had regarding listing your site on the
search engines . . . and whether or not you
received spam or a lot of unnecessary hits?
---------------
Have you measured the difference with parking
your pictures on the home server versus having
them parked on a free server elsewhere, and
tagging the picture off-line? Or is the bandwidth
cost the same?
---------------
If you list your forum on the search engines,
and have the domain terminate on an html page,
whereby the member has to manually click to
access your pearl forum . . . would that save
hits and bandwidth . . . versus having all of
your domains hit on your pearl forum?
---------------
I have used jpg pictures over bmp pictures
thinking that the size of the jpg file comes
out smaller than a bmp file, and therefore
should save me bandwidth when the picture loads
up. Is that true?
---------------
Is there another picture format that I can use
besides jpg and bmp files that will produce a
high quality large image, but will use less
bandwidth?
---------------
There's been a lot of talk about the size
of a forum that grows, and what to do with
archiving the old topics. Has anyone tried
parking an Archive Site elsewhere for free,
which would have less traffic?
---------------
Is it possible to save on hits by combining
ALL of the (6-10) separate pictures on one
page into ONE image file, so as to eliminate
having the page load 6 to 10 times for each picture?
Any other ideas for saving on hit and bandwidth
costs?
Thanks,
David