PDA

View Full Version : What host & machine is best to run VB 3.6.4 using mysql 5.0.24 ???


Make Money?-old
Fri 9th Feb '07, 11:47am
Seems this is hard to find..

Can anyone reccomend a dedicated server Host
Dedicated Lynux machine
that can deal with mysql 5.0.24

WE DONT WANT CPanel

Most server co's are saying - we wont suport this.

We need it.

Any ideas..

Thanks in advance...
hescominsoon
Fri 9th Feb '07, 12:03pm
Seems this is hard to find..

Can anyone reccomend a dedicated server Host
Dedicated Lynux machine
that can deal with mysql 5.0.24

WE DONT WANT CPanel

Most server co's are saying - we wont suport this.

We need it.

Any ideas..

Thanks in advance...
how much a month are you looking to spend And what kind of traffic do you generate?
dekard
Fri 9th Feb '07, 12:46pm
Seems this is hard to find..

Can anyone reccomend a dedicated server Host
Dedicated Lynux machine
that can deal with mysql 5.0.24

WE DONT WANT CPanel

Most server co's are saying - we wont suport this.

We need it.

Any ideas..

Thanks in advance...
I like www.liquidweb.com (http://www.liquidweb.com) for that.. thats my host for www.overclockingwiki.org (http://www.overclockingwiki.org) and I've been very happy with their support and options.. cpanel is there and works great.
Zachery
Fri 9th Feb '07, 3:11pm
Any reason you don't want cPanel?
express
Sat 10th Feb '07, 1:20pm
Mysql 5.0.27 runs fine as standalone no control panel or with cpanel. Runs fine on both.

Joey
Make Money?-old
Wed 14th Feb '07, 12:42pm
sys admin complains Cpanel take a bite out of the sever speed & makes higher load averages.

Forum works blazingly fast without it, just OK with it.
Zachery
Wed 14th Feb '07, 3:41pm
cPanel is not clogging down your server, my sites all run blazingly fast with cpanel. You need to tune any server ;) cPanel or not.d
medialayer
Sun 18th Feb '07, 8:27pm
cPanel is not clogging down your server, my sites all run blazingly fast with cpanel. You need to tune any server ;) cPanel or not.d
cPanel itself is inherently inefficient code and more or less bloatware if all you need to do is host a few sites.

Control panels like DirectAdmin are much lighter and perform better...not necessarily for the websites, but for the control panel itself.

DirectAdmin has good support for Apache 2.0.x as well 2.2.x, whereas cPanel is stuck on 1.3.x.

Apache 2.2.x offers high performance according to our benchmarks, thus we use it. Regardless, if the OP does not require a control panel, they should go for Lighttpd - www.lighttpd.net.
hescominsoon
Mon 19th Feb '07, 8:56am
cPanel itself is inherently inefficient code and more or less bloatware if all you need to do is host a few sites.

Control panels like DirectAdmin are much lighter and perform better...not necessarily for the websites, but for the control panel itself.

DirectAdmin has good support for Apache 2.0.x as well 2.2.x, whereas cPanel is stuck on 1.3.x.

Apache 2.2.x offers high performance according to our benchmarks, thus we use it. Regardless, if the OP does not require a control panel, they should go for Lighttpd - www.lighttpd.net (http://www.lighttpd.net).

virtualmin GPL and virtualmin pro are two other control panels that i use.